<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the &#8216;Sphere - July</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sphere.com/blog/2007/07/30/in-the-sphere-july/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sphere.com/blog/2007/07/30/in-the-sphere-july/</link>
	<description>Connecting the Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: reggieCasual</title>
		<link>http://www.sphere.com/blog/2007/07/30/in-the-sphere-july/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>reggieCasual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sphere.com/blog/2007/07/30/in-the-sphere-july/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>I guess one good plug deserves another  (double-entendre intended).  ;-)

Many thanks for the "casual" mention and plug for my new blogs.   Who would have ever thought one could launch a blog focused only on tomatoes?

Again, many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess one good plug deserves another  (double-entendre intended).  <img src='http://www.sphere.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Many thanks for the &#8220;casual&#8221; mention and plug for my new blogs.   Who would have ever thought one could launch a blog focused only on tomatoes?</p>
<p>Again, many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladynada</title>
		<link>http://www.sphere.com/blog/2007/07/30/in-the-sphere-july/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>ladynada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sphere.com/blog/2007/07/30/in-the-sphere-july/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the plug!

While I have your attention, I want to tell you something that I have learned about related posts and mysql database.  You may have your techies check into this:  You actually get better matches by testing on the subject/title only and not on the content.  I read that while researching and then I tested it.  I changed my related posts plugin, built the keyword table and tested the results on several blog entries.  The result was VERY POOR matches.  Then I went back to just running it by the post title and got back my VERY GOOD matches.  I do not know the technical reason why this is so, but as I say, I read it (so someone else discovered it) and then I tested it.  Your techies will love sleuthing this one out; perhaps they can combine both methods or use one as a default when nothing or too few are found.

ok nuff of that!
nada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the plug!</p>
<p>While I have your attention, I want to tell you something that I have learned about related posts and mysql database.  You may have your techies check into this:  You actually get better matches by testing on the subject/title only and not on the content.  I read that while researching and then I tested it.  I changed my related posts plugin, built the keyword table and tested the results on several blog entries.  The result was VERY POOR matches.  Then I went back to just running it by the post title and got back my VERY GOOD matches.  I do not know the technical reason why this is so, but as I say, I read it (so someone else discovered it) and then I tested it.  Your techies will love sleuthing this one out; perhaps they can combine both methods or use one as a default when nothing or too few are found.</p>
<p>ok nuff of that!<br />
nada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
